Thoughts on ‘Boneshaker’

I’m not the biggest fan of zombies. They don’t automatically make everything better, and I find stories focusing on them to be frustrating in many ways, from the impossible logistics of the undead spreading so quickly to the infuriatingly stupid behavior of the protagonists (Rick Grimes from The Walking Dead, it is generally a bad idea to go into Atlanta when you see a long line of abandoned cars on the way out. There’s usually a reason those people were trying to get away).

So I was very pleasantly surprised when Cherie Priest’s Boneshaker averted most of the things I find annoying about zombies.

For one thing, the story is set in an alternate version of the Civil War, in the Seattle area just after the city has grown in a mining boom. Since I love any kind of historical fiction, especially anything that incorporates elements of the fantastic, I was already inclined to be interested, even if that element was zombies. Add the fact that the protagonist is a woman struggling to reconnect with her son, and I go from interested to intrigued. With good worldbuilding and a setting steeped in atmosphere, I went from intrigued to a fan.

Seattle is sealed off. A mining machine meant to facilitate and increase productivity ran amok, tearing through the underside of the city, causing buildings to collapse and roads to disintegrate. But the greatest devastation came from the gas that was released from underground by the Boneshaker’s rampage. Those who inhaled it died quickly- and of those who died, not all remained dead. They took over the city; those who survived fled.

Briar Wilkes is one of those survivors. And as the widow of the man who invented the Boneshaker and brought about the destruction, she’s tried her best to keep her head down, work hard, and make sure that her son Ezekiel does not have to deal with the ghosts her husband passed on. What she didn’t count on was her son’s determination to prove his father innocent of the rumors that he destroyed the city on purpose- a determination that leads him to enter the walled-off city to find evidence to prove it.

I think what I liked most about this book was the atmosphere. The smoky, nasty, horrible feeling of walking around in a gas-filled city seemed to leap off the page and pollute the room, and I loved it. I like when the gritty details are so tangible I can see them, and this book had those details in spades. Oddly enough, it wasn’t very gory, but the dialects of the characters, the mechanics of how the underground community of Seattle worked, the various effects and uses of the gas that caused the disaster, and the odd and detailed technology all made this world seem real. Even if the zombies are there, they’re just a hazard of living that the people have adapted to, rather than a world-ending apocalypse. I found that really neat, as it gives the reader more of an opportunity to find out more about how the people of this world lived.

But as we all know, a good world doesn’t necessarily mean that the book is good- characters are a major part of that. Luckily the characters are all really enjoyable. I loved Briar for her struggles and her determination to fix things between herself and her son, who really nicely averted the cliché of a teenager going on a quest that will fix everything (when he acts stupid, he’s called out on it). I loved the side characters a lot, and the main villain is very spooky with how much he has the underworld of Seattle in thrall. My only complaint was that I really wanted to spend more time with the characters, and I sometimes found the dynamics and power relations between the gas smugglers (the gas that caused the zombies can be modified to form a drug that’s immensely popular, if illegal) and the community living in the underbelly of the city confusing. That said, there was a lot going on in this book, so it’s not really surprising that some of it would be confusing, and my confusion on that point didn’t affect my reading or understanding what the main goals of the protagonists were.

I think overall this was easily one of the most enjoyable books I’ve read this year. It’s not great literature by any stretch of the imagination, but the characters are so great and the world is concrete that I didn’t care. I just had a blast reading about Briar and Zeke and Princess Angeline and Swakhammer and everyone else who populated this crazy world. I was pleasantly surprised too by how well the many different elements came together to form a cohesive whole. Within the setting of this world, the airships, the zombies, and the smugglers all actually had a place and a role and weren’t just thrown in for effect. I would love to see this and the later books set in this universe made into a mini-series or movie, just because it would be so different and so much more fun than most of the zombie fare out there (Walking Dead, I’m looking at you). That’ll probably never happen in my lifetime, but at least I can take comfort in the fact that there are other books in this universe for me to enjoy when I need a break from Anna Karenina or some other such tome.

Plus- bad pun ahead- it’s nice to have some brain candy every once in a while.


6 thoughts on “Thoughts on ‘Boneshaker’

  1. Ooooh this sounds really great. I’ve never actually read a zombie book. From watching zombie films they don’t really appeal to me, they all just seem so similar. But this book sounds like one not to overlook. Very nice review Maggie. 🙂 Is this an old book or is it more recent?

    P.S. I personally liked the pun, but then I’m just dorky like that. 😉

    • I hadn’t either, actually- I’d just seen Shaun of Dead (which I will admit to loving, but that’s because it’s meant to be a parody of sorts) and some episodes of The Walking Dead, which were kind of lackluster. But yeah, I really enjoyed this book. It was just a lot of fun to read, what with the alternate history and the steampunk technology and cool characters. It was published in… *checks copy* 2009. So it’s fairly recent. I’m glad you liked the review! 🙂

      That pun just fit too perfectly, there’s no way I could resist it 😀

      • Ahh yes, I thought Shawn of the dead was pretty good too.

        Ohh right cool thanks. I just wondered because of the sort of sepia old fashioned look whether it was old or just in that sort of style.
        I don’t think I’ve ever read something that was classed in the steampunk genre, (that I know of) so I guess that’s another reason to check it out! 🙂

        • I think my favorite thing about it was how “Get to the Winchester!” was the automatic solution to everything.

          It’s actually printed in sepia-ish tones and stuff. So it looks really cool. And yeah, I’ve never read anything steampunk either (unless you count the forefrathers of that genre, Wells and Verne) so I wasn’t sure what this would be like, but I ended up enjoying it a lot more than I was expecting.

  2. I quite like US Civil War stuff actually, and I agree on the zombie stuff. It’s usually a bit daft.

    I remember watching 28 Days Later, and actually being quite intrigued with it for the most part. Unfortunately, the last 30 mins or so let it down completely. I don’t know what it is about British films, but they can have some nice drama, and build up, and then it goes crap at the end. It’s as if the film makers get to the last week of the filming schedule, and suddenly realise that they don’t have much time left, and just cram any old nonsense in to finish it off.

    Hollywood ftw.

    • Civil War stuff is really fascinating. I need to brush up on it again, it’s been a while since I studied that period of history, and there’s quite a lot to absorb there. And yeah… it’s hard for me to take zombies seriously. Shaun of the Dead is probably to blame for that, as it’s really the only zombie movie I saw… that and the show The Walking Dead which I found rather underwhelming given how much I’d heard about how good it was.

      I have heard good things about 28 Days Later. It’s one I’ve been meaning to see but haven’t been able to track down. All I know about it is that it gave my sister nightmares. And as for filmmakers… yeah. Though I think Hollywood suffers A LOT a bit from overdoing cliches in movies and trying to ape things that have worked before. It may just be a problem with the entertainment industry in general (for the record, I’m a somewhat disgruntled lover of good stories in any medium).


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s