Thoughts on ‘Anna Karenina’

I may not be fond of Leo Tolstoy’s definition of art, but I won’t deny that he was talented as a writer- especially not after having finished Anna Karenina, the novel widely regarded as his best work. This book was a long read, but one that I savored (for the most part) rather than slogged through, and though there were some flaws, it makes a beautiful telling of very painful subjects. “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”

And thus begins a story detailing the lives of three families, the Oblonskys, the Karenins, and the Levins, all of which experience extreme unhappiness over the course of the novel. Their coping is varied, and despite the fact that the ending of the novel is relatively uplifting, not one of the families is ever truly happy over the course of the story.

The tale begins with the Oblonsky family falling apart under the strain of the husband Stepan’s unfaithfulness to his wife Dolly. His affair with a former governess has just been exposed and Dolly is threatening to leave him and take their children with her. In an effort to bring about a reconciliation, Stepan’s sister Anna comes to their house to try and patch things up between the couple, since she is close to both of them. She succeeds enough to keep Dolly from leaving, though her efforts to gain a fuller forgiveness between the husband and wife are in vain.

While she stays with them, she meets Vronsky, an officer with charm and a fickle nature, who has been seeing Kitty, the sister of Dolly Oblonsky. Anna and Vronsky meet at a ball, and as their attraction to each other grows, Anna’s family life in turn begins to come apart at the seams. Meanwhile Kitty’s old friend and unsuccessful suitor Levin tries to cope with his love’s rejection and his own scattered and discontented life. And Kitty, who had refused Levin in the hopes that Vronsky would marry her, is struggling to deal with her position and her choices, now that she has given up what seems to be her only chance to get married. Meanwhile Anna’s husband is struggling to maintain his position and respectability in society and government in the face of his helplessness to cope with his wife’s infidelity and his own pettiness.

Yeah, there’s a lot going on in this novel.

This book was an interesting reading experience. Tolstoy paints an amazing portrait of the high Russian society, and it’s fascinating to see the various reactions to Anna’s affair and how in some subtle way a search for love and meaning in life is mirrored in each of the three families. And when he’s focusing on the dynamics between the characters and the families, his writing is amazingly compelling, beautifully written, and often heartbreaking.

But then, there’s Levin. Oh, Levin. When he was first introduced, I found him an intriguing and rather sad character, one who might well ruin his only chances of happiness because of his pride and lack of self-confidence. As the novel went on, he went from sad to rather irritating, due to his constant griping about everything from his own inadequacies of personality to the uselessness of society, to the difficulties of dealing with women. He seemed to be heading towards extreme bitterness, which while not a likeable transition was still at least mildly interesting. Then Tolstoy began using him as a mouthpiece to spout of on the glories of the Russian peasantry, and from that point on every time a chapter began in his viewpoint I wanted to put the book down, or skip ahead to the next chapter about the Karenins. Part of what made me so angry about Tolstoy using the character as a soapbox was that I really wanted to like the guy. He’d been through a lot and had a rather difficult life and family. I wanted to root for him as he tried to find meaning in his life, but he got so whiny over the course of the story that I just stopped caring. The novel ends on his viewpoint, and while it’s actually quite beautifully written, I couldn’t appreciate it as much because I was so worn out by Levin’s constant angsting.

But my gripes aside, there were some amazing characters in this novel. The titular character is obvious- she keeps making bad choices and hurting those around her, and yet by some miracle I kept wanting her to get a second chance. I think it was because she was very much aware of her own failings, which made her constant mistakes all the more maddening and sad. She knew what she was destroying by her affair with Vronsky and carried on, and is not protected from the consequences. It’s heartbreaking seeing what this amazing woman becomes, and the worst is that it doesn’t feel contrived.

I also found her husband a fascinating character, one that I frankly wanted to see more of. I found his crisis a lot more interesting than Levin’s constant internal battles, because not only is it an actual crisis for Karenin (his political standing and career is threatened because of Anna’s actions), but he is genuinely hurt by what Anna’s doing, even if he doesn’t love her. He has no idea what to do about the affair or how to cope with what it’s doing to his family, and I felt sorry for him, partly because every other character holds him in contempt for his lack of understanding. I really wanted to get to know him better, and it was a shame that we lost sight of him in favor of Levin’s whining about farming.

Overall this is definitely a book I’d recommend. The characters are strong, as is the writing, for the most part. It’s a heartbreaking work, because it shows how petty human vices can bring about immense sorrow and suffering, both for those who indulge in them and those around them. Not to mention there’s a movie coming out that actually looks somewhat passable (costumes are gorgeous, at the very least). So if you have time for 800 pages of dysfunctional Russian families, I’d definitely recommend this classic.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Thoughts on ‘Anna Karenina’

  1. So I’m about one hundred pages shy of the end (but alas, I know how it’s going to end so no surprise there…) It’s interesting because I am completely opposite of your views! I adored Levin. Sure, sure, he grew a wee bit lengthy about his farming but I expected the book to be used as a political piece to some extent. Also my ignorance of the time period perhaps made it less insufferable? I never really saw him as whining as much as him dealing with his insecurities. Plus, I loved how honest he remained while getting married, and realizing it wasn’t how he perceived it would be or even childbirth. So believable.

    And oh my. Anna K. What a wretched woman. I WANTED to like her, cheer for her, fight for her…but she made it so difficult. I wish that I didn’t see her as so manipulative and cold especially when she risked everything for following her desire, which given the time period, was extremely difficult. She’s like an irredeemable antihero.

    • I think I should have said that I like Anna as a character much more than I would like her as a person. I find her actions difficult to say the least, but I still think that she’s interesting because of how contradictory she is about her own desires and her own understanding. It makes for some interesting interactions with those around her, and I liked seeing the effect she had on people. I think she had potential for redemption, but she kept throwing it away out of her own pride, and she made the lives of those around her miserable. So I don’t think you’re under any obligation to like her 🙂 To be honest I found Karenin to be one of my favorite characters, even though he had some major issues. I still got the sense that he was trying to do the right thing.

      And I did like Levin when he was interacting with the other characters, for the most part. It was just when he was going on and on about his farming and the peasantry that I got irritated. He became a lot more bearable when interacting with Kitty or his family.

  2. I love a bit of dysfunctional family literature, so it will be very interesting to try a Russian one. Do you know what time period of Russia the novel is supposed to be set in?

    I think I will probably avoid the film until I have read the book, I wouldn’t want any of the plot to be given away beforehand.

  3. Pingback: Summer Reading, Or How I Learned To Grit My Teeth And Turn Pages | I Could Be Arguing In My Spare Time

Comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s